Shielding Art

liquidindian: Yes, some excellent tabloid hysteria here:
liquidindian: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1216924/Tate-Modern-display-nude-picture-10-year-old-Brooke-Shields-alongside-giant-pornographic-images.html
liquidindian: "'Putting a sign on the door like that means every paedophile in the land will head straight to that room.'"
JDHarper: Makes them easier to catch, right?
gordonfrohman: They claimed the picture would attract paedophiles to the gallery and said organisers should have taken advice from parents before deciding to show it.
gordonfrohman: well, if you see anyone masturbating in front of the picture, arrest them
stresstwig: ha Visual impact This installation by American Keith Haring is less pornographic but still hard to take in
stresstwig: IT'S HARD TO TAKE IN
stresstwig: STOP IT ART
stresstwig: STOP IT
niteowl: isn't that the shots from Blue Lago-- oh, it is
niteowl: i don't get it
chris: no, no, that's a DIFFERENT nude underage shot of shields
liquidindian: Just say it's child porn, and huff and puff a bit.
liquidindian: You can say 'speaking as a father', too!
niteowl: speaking as a child father, HUFF, PUFF! BLOW ME ABS! ARR!!! porn!
liquidindian: Good work.